| |
May 18, 2006
The Baltic Countries Entrance into the U.S. Visa Waiver Program
MR. SHIMKUS: Mr. Speaker, today I rise to speak in opposition to the
perceived exclusion of the countries of Estonia, Latvia and
Lithuania from an amendment adopted by the Senate in their
immigration bill yesterday.
While I approve of this amendment to allow for a two year trial
expansion of the Visa Waiver Program, I disagree with the
requirements that are placed upon countries that would want to
partcipate. This program enables nationals of certain countries to
travel to the United States for tourism or business for stays of 90
days or less without obtaining a visa.
According to the language of Senate Amendment 4000, a country must
provide material support which means that the current provision
of the equivalent of, but not less than, a battalion (which consists
of 300 to 1,000 military personnel) to Operation Iraqi Freedom or
Operation Enduring Freedom to provide training, logistical or
tactical support, or a military presence.
I feel that it is ineffective to place a number requirement on these
smaller countries in the region. All of the Baltic countries have
been steadfast and supportive allies of the United States since they
gained their independence following the fall of Soviet Union and
have continued to be supportive in the ongoing War on Terror.
While these countries are short of this amendments required troop
number, it seems to me that the best way to evaluate a countrys
eligibility for the Visa Waiver Program is to determine whether the
country is a good ally and friend to the United States, not put a
number on their commitment. All of these former Soviet satellite
countries are continuing to actively work to implement the highest
of technology within their border security, including biometric
passports far ahead of some of their western European neighbors.
Currently, several of the 27 countries already in the Visa Waiver
Program have committed zero troops to either mission. Why should
such a requirement be placed on those countries that have already
made a sacrifice when others are rewarded for their
non-participation?
Furthermore, small countries like Lithuania with a population of 3.5
million, Latvia with 2.8 million or Estonia at 1.3 million clearly
do not have as large a military as a country like Poland, which has
over 38 million citizens, 30 million more than all 3 Baltic States
combined. I feel that it is irresponsible to belittle their
commitment and sacrifice to Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation
Enduring Freedom by not allowing them into the Visa Waiver Program
within the specifics of the amendment.
Also, each of the Baltic States have troops participating in out of
area NATO missions. One of the Provincial Reconstruction Teams in
Afghanistan is led by Lithuanian troops. Do these soldiers operating
within the North American Treaty Organization not count towards
their troop commitment in the language of this amendment? These are
important questions that need to be addressed.
As Co-Chairman of the House Baltic Caucus I understand the concerns
the Baltic countries have with this amendment and I urge the
Conferees of the immigration bill to keep their concerns in mind as
we work through the differences between both the Senate and House
legislation.Congressman John Shimkus (R-IL),
Co-Chair of the Baltic Caucus in the U.S. House of
Representatives
|
Lithuanian American Community
Baltijos šalių remėjai
Kongrese |